How Are Private Insurers Covering At-Home Rapid COVID Tests? – Kaiser Family Foundation

June 16, 2022 By admin

Filling the need for trusted information on national health issues
Filling the need for trusted information on national health issues
Lindsey Dawson , Krutika Amin , Jennifer Kates , and Cynthia Cox Jan 20, 2022
Under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, two COVID-19 emergency measures passed by Congress, private insurance companies generally have been required to cover COVID-19 tests ordered by providers, typically those conducted on site, such as in clinical or pop-up environments (providers can also seek federal reimbursement for testing uninsured patients). This broad coverage requirement has been in place since the early days of the pandemic, and the only exceptions are that private insurers do not have to reimburse for tests conducted for public health surveillance or workplace requirements.

The Biden Administration announced on December 2, 2021 (followed by detailed guidance released on January 10, 2022) that private insurers would be required to also begin covering the cost of rapid at-home COVID-19 tests purchased over-the-counter starting January 15, 2022.
Under the new guidance, private insurance companies must cover up to 8 FDA-authorized rapid tests per member per month. This averages out to be about 2 rapid tests per week for those eligible. This policy applies to all private health insurers, and does not apply to Medicaid managed care or Medicare Advantage plans. Private insurers are required to provide a coverage mechanism for their members, though some are just beginning to set up these processes. In addition to offering reimbursement for tests purchased out-of-pocket, the guidance also encourages insurers to set up “direct coverage” options. In these arrangements, enrollees can buy rapid at-home tests without paying anything up front or navigating a complicated reimbursement process if the test is obtained through a preferred network of pharmacies or retailers, or through a mail order option. Enrollees in plans with direct coverage options can still seek reimbursement for tests purchased at non-preferred retailers as well, but the guidance allows insurers to cap reimbursement at $12 per test. If the insurance company does not have a direct coverage option, then it must reimburse the enrollee for the full cost of the test. The aims of these provisions are to both simplify coverage for consumers (though the direct coverage option) and mitigate inflationary effects on test prices (through the cap). Insurers have an incentive to set up direct coverage options because the $12 reimbursement cap can also help limit their costs. If many or most insurers set up these programs and implement the $12 cap, it could also impact the price of tests as retailers and manufactures aim for the reimbursement target.
To assess how insurers are beginning to implement this policy, from a consumer perspective, we reviewed publicly available rapid at-home COVID tests coverage and reimbursement policies for the 13 private insurers with at least 1 million fully-insured members across their U.S. subsidiaries (Table 1) between January 18, 2022 and January 20, 2022. These private insurers cover about 6 in 10 people in the fully-insured commercial market. Most of these parent companies have the same coverage and reimbursement policy across all of their subsidiaries, but when that was not the case, we include the policy for their largest subsidiary.
At this time, about half of the insurers reviewed are implementing their testing coverage policy using only reimbursement.
The remaining half of the top insurers had a direct coverage option set up at the time of review. 
Enrollees in plans with a direct coverage option may have reimbursement limited to $12 per test if a test is purchased outside of this option.
The success of this policy hinges on two main factors: the availability of tests and the ability of enrollees to navigate the reimbursement or direct coverage process. As we have written elsewhere, despite recent efforts to increase supply of tests, it can still be challenging to find a home COVID-test online and at pharmacies. If supply remains limited and tests are not widely available, a reimbursement or direct coverage mechanism does not do much to improve access.
People who do find rapid tests may also have difficulty navigating the reimbursement or direct coverage process. As our analysis shows, in the early days of implementation, insurers have varying coverage policies, including whether they have a direct coverage option or require enrollees to request reimbursement, and when enrollees seek reimbursement, whether they do so online or through mail or fax. Some of these processes will inevitably be more consumer friendly than others and will either facilitate coverage or put up additional barriers. Even if the cost is eventually reimbursed, many families could face financial barriers if their insurer requires upfront payment. Many people do not have easy access to printers or fax machines, required by some insurers for reimbursement, which will likely mean that some claims will never be submitted. Additionally, as noted, this policy applies only to those with private insurance so those who are uninsured or those with other coverage, will have to navigate different options, including ordering tests directly from the federal government (with a current limit of four per household). Still, this new policy is a step towards improving COVID-19 test accessibility and affordability in the U.S.
Follow KFF
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Headquarters: 185 Berry St., Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94107 | Phone 650-854-9400
Washington Offices and Barbara Jordan Conference Center: 1330 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005 | Phone 202-347-5270
www.kff.org | Email Alerts: kff.org/email | facebook.com/KaiserFamilyFoundation | twitter.com/kff
Filling the need for trusted information on national health issues, the Kaiser Family Foundation is a nonprofit organization based in San Francisco, California.

source